Phototips 發表於 2012-12-4 17:37:07

EPSON STYLUS PHOTO R3000 VS Canon PIXMA PRO-1

EPSON STYLUS PHOTO R3000 VS Canon PIXMA PRO-1
around same price what choose ?/ please help

RRT 發表於 2012-12-4 20:54:26

睇過兩部個人比喜歡pro 1因有光油印光面紙好d
可比較埋pro 10
http://www.canon.com.hk/tc/product/catalog/productitem.do?categoryID=28&seriesID=10028

neofung* 發表於 2012-12-4 20:58:13

Phototips 發表於 2012-12-5 18:49:42

有Fina Printing

aaronchan 發表於 2012-12-5 22:59:24

I think for general use Epson R3000 will be a better choice.
I really like the Pro-1 with the Gloss Optimizer, but there is one thing you guys have to keep it in your mind,
the GO will not print borderless which means you either going to trim your final print or you will have to mat it up.
The other disadvantage is that if you use A4 or letter size (8.5x11") paper, you won't be able to print 8x10 image due to the 35mm bottom unprintable margin.
It is a big machincal design mistake, I think. I have also already sent an email to their directors about this stupid problem. (Acutally this problem happens on their big machine 6x00, 8x00 as well.)

The R3000 has wireless which I think it's a good option for us who don't have our printer sitting right next to our computer.
The other thing is if you like to print B&W, the Advanced B&W mode is fantastic it!
Plus, if you own an Eye-One or ColorMunki, or Sypder SR, you can use Quadtone RIP to enhance the outcome of your B&W print as well.
For glossiness, I don't see any problem but like what I've said before, Hong Kong people, by some how LOVE to see their picture in SUPER high gloss.
IMO, I think that looks ugly. I never use high gloss paper for any of my clients, pro or semi-pro.
Something like Hahnemhule Photo Rag Pearl or Fine Art Baryta would show better result on Most (which means 99%) images than using high gloss RC photo paper.

aaron

neofung* 發表於 2012-12-5 23:45:10

neofung* 發表於 2012-12-6 00:06:06

DLBB 發表於 2012-12-6 09:52:38

Epson HK揾客笨, printer貴US好多

R3000 US祇賣US$599

http://www.epson.com/cgi-bin/Store/jsp/ProductCategory.do?BV_UseBVCookie=yes&oid=-8170

neofung* 發表於 2012-12-6 14:51:21

Ming_Lau 發表於 2012-12-6 15:42:50

neofung* 發表於 2012-12-5 11:45 PM static/image/common/back.gif
我記得朋友部canon 6100印到 24"x36"無邊喎,不過缺點係癈墨cartridge滿得好快。

if沒記錯, Roll paper可以 (因為可印完trim出來), 但sheet paper吾得

Ming_Lau 發表於 2012-12-6 15:44:55

neofung* 發表於 2012-12-6 12:06 AM static/image/common/back.gif
講多少少,glossy或ultra glossy相紙,真係純粹個人喜好,無話好唔好。
香港偏好ultra glossy,會唔會同香 ...

雖然都真係係個人喜好。但係實際用落, 如果係大大張相再整埋個玻璃相框, ultra glossy似乎實在太易反光了

Ming_Lau 發表於 2012-12-6 15:50:04

aaronchan 發表於 2012-12-5 10:59 PM static/image/common/back.gif
I think for general use Epson R3000 will be a better choice.
I really like the Pro-1 with the Gloss ...

兩部機比較我又有一樣野擔心, 如果印量少epson會吾會好易塞?
呢點相信係Aaronchan兄從來都吾需要擔心的問題:tongue:

neofung* 發表於 2012-12-6 16:29:48

neofung* 發表於 2012-12-6 16:32:19

Ming_Lau 發表於 2012-12-6 17:12:28

neofung* 發表於 2012-12-6 04:32 PM static/image/common/back.gif
所以唔建議大過A4用glossy紙。
另外,glossy紙落玻璃,好易有"控"。

講開d "控", 都真係好多人將d相放相架而吾加紙框隔開, 好多人認為一張普通3-4R相沒咩理由要特登加個紙框俾佢攪到個相架大一大, 我都吾係吾同意。

不過我又真係遇過D客俾D幾十年前黏玻璃相我問我有沒得救。佢地D經驗話我知,好多時今日覺得一張沒咩特別甚至影得好差的普通4R相,他日對佢地來講可能會變得好珍貴。

如果NEOFUNG兄朋友部機個TRIMMER 少於 240GSM易炒, 可能刀片頓左了

neofung* 發表於 2012-12-6 18:14:08

DLBB 發表於 2012-12-6 20:19:28

本帖最後由 DLBB 於 2012-12-6 08:44 PM 編輯

小弟相架用低反光度透明膠板唔用玻璃, 一來減少反光, 二來相架輕好多, 三來冇咁易黏住相面

aaronchan 發表於 2012-12-6 22:15:15

neofung* 發表於 2012-12-5 11:45 PM static/image/common/back.gif
我記得朋友部canon 6100印到 24"x36"無邊喎,不過缺點係癈墨cartridge滿得好快。

I own a 8300 and they only print borderless with certain size of ROLL paper.
Pro-1 doesn't do that. And it can't even handle roll paper like R3000

aaronchan 發表於 2012-12-6 22:17:18

Ming_Lau 發表於 2012-12-6 03:44 PM static/image/common/back.gif
雖然都真係係個人喜好。但係實際用落, 如果係大大張相再整埋個玻璃相框, ultra glossy似乎實在太易反光了

Anything bigger than 8x10 with High Gloss paper looks like shxt
Trust me on this. I handle more than 1000 prints which are bigger than that size every single month. My clients are from individual photographer to photo museum from Europe and U.S.

Ming_Lau 發表於 2012-12-6 22:17:42

DLBB 發表於 2012-12-6 08:19 PM static/image/common/back.gif
小弟相架用低反光度透明膠板唔用玻璃, 一來減少反光, 二來相架輕好多, 三來冇咁易黏住相面

重有個最大好處係安全{:1_152:}
頁: [1] 2 3
查看完整版本: EPSON STYLUS PHOTO R3000 VS Canon PIXMA PRO-1