菲林可唔可以曬到A1 SIZE
CHING, 想問菲林曬相有冇限制? 可唔可以曬到A1 SIZE咁大？thanks 35mm 就唔好囉.120都OK 嘩
a１有幾大？ 6x6 with good lens no problem la... 原帖由 allsir 於 2009-10-14 11:26 PM 發表 http://www.dchome.net/images/common/back.gif
嘩
a１有幾大？
840mm X 594mm 好睇你條片影/沖成點,試過crop 1/4張晒16X20都可以聞相,但係影/沖得衰,全底晒8R都唔收貨:titter: why not???
but the image quality:smile1 :smile1 是可以的。但若說你放大至 A1 還要求近距離聞相的話, 那便有畫質的問題了。這是物理限制。
看書看過, 柯達多年前用其 135 底片放大至一幅大牆般大在約紐中央車站賣廣告。 岩呀ＣＨＩＮＧ，
Ａ１咁大，
你都唔會去近睇佢啦。
如果你行開２米睇，唔會好粗粒既。
:handshake 唔理放晒後質素, 最大應該係6呎X35呎, 東亞應該仲做到.
不過就算4X5片底, 晒A1你都可能覺得粗, 問題係你點樣去「聞」一張相. 原帖由 yausw812 於 2009-10-14 10:33 PM 發表 http://www.dchome.net/images/common/back.gif
CHING, 想問菲林曬相有冇限制? 可唔可以曬到A1 SIZE咁大？thanks
曬12r 我都隻眼開眼閉:L (135菲林) 我見過有師傅手沖出相
係可以出得好靚o既, 我睇要睇下個用途。
你放咁大張做乜野用？ 只要將你d 作品攞出去比錢人用貴架scanner 電分
而後有個圖像處理師幫你作出修正.
交給大形晒相公司....出相就可以.
A1 SIZE 無問題.:handshake
我做印刷的...用過這個手法幫客人135底直出做一張a1 post 印刷品.
我吾建議你光學晒相...因為水凖吾隠定:victory:
[ 本帖最後由 S.W. 於 2009-10-15 11:54 AM 編輯 ] 原帖由 香港至NET超人 於 2009-10-15 10:14 AM 發表 http://www.dchome.net/images/common/back.gif
唔理放晒後質素, 最大應該係6呎X35呎, 東亞應該仲做到.
不過就算4X5片底, 晒A1你都可能覺得粗, 問題係你點樣去「聞」一張相.
Very true! 「聞」張 is not the way to look at a big photo. Should be look from distance then the quality of lens is important. It is no longer the problem of resolution and sharpness only. 曾經有條片話菲林相可以曬到兩、三層樓咁高 原帖由 nelson33 於 2009-10-15 02:20 PM 發表 http://www.dchome.net/images/common/back.gif
曾經有條片話菲林相可以曬到兩、三層樓咁高
google search -> liquad light S.W. (推動攝影界) 版主
for general purpose, the $$$$$$$$:L :L
相 is not for 聞 , 相 is for explain something, like record the past
for me, quality of the prints is not important
the important is the photo (now is image), with meaning 原帖由 lonelycamman 於 2009-10-15 11:33 PM 發表 http://www.dchome.net/images/common/back.gif
S.W. (推動攝影界) 版主
for general purpose, the $$$$$$$$:L :L
相 is not for 聞 , 相 is for explain something, like record the past
for me, quality of the prints is not important
the import ...
S.W. (推動攝影界) 版主係講商業用途,
唔係一般用家.
講到商業既, 由無到有都要做啦.
更何況135MM菲林出大POSTER... 原帖由 lonelycamman 於 2009-10-15 11:33 PM 發表 http://www.dchome.net/images/common/back.gif
S.W. (推動攝影界) 版主
for general purpose, the $$$$$$$$:L :L
相 is not for 聞 , 相 is for explain something, like record the past
for me, quality of the prints is not important
the import ...
This is what Robert Frank said to us:
Photography should contain 3 parts
Good Capture (select the subject or moment you want to photograph)
Good Edit (select the images from contact sheets)
Good Print (Good Quality of printing)
maybe quality of prints are not important to you, but not to the true photographers:titter:
頁:
[1]
2