找回密碼
 註冊

拍攝極光鏡頭選擇

harima 發表於 2017-9-26 21:11:49 | 顯示全部樓層 |閱讀模式
本帖最後由 harima 於 2017-9-26 09:13 PM 編輯

各位師兄好,小弟會於聖誕節前往俄羅斯影極光,
目前器材有5D4,24-70LII,35LII,24LII
目前想再購入一個鏡頭影極光用,因為可能一生人都睇5到幾多次極光
所以想自己在器材方面準備好D,目前有2個心水的鏡頭
1)Sigma 14mm F1.8 ART, 超廣角、大光圈
但不能裝保護鏡,加上除了影星空,銀河之外,實用性不大

2)Canon 16-35LIII ,實用性高,影風景必備
但是看網上評論說週邊失光嚴重,不適合用來影銀河同星空,咁的話佢2.8的光圈即係無用?

目前我比教傾向16-35LIII 的,因為實用性大,可裝保護鏡~
加上我也很喜歡影風景的~
但這支鏡頭拿來拍極光,銀河,星空的話可以嗎?
有師兄可以分享一下經驗和照片嗎?謝謝~
Alphonse89 發表於 2017-9-28 11:07:11 | 顯示全部樓層
借支14mm 比朋友去挪威影極光,

佢影完返黎既意見係14mm都唔夠wide

點評

tye
這亦是我的個人經驗...當極光係你正前面的時候,14mm多數都足夠. 但當極光係你頭頂過或角度好高的時候,12mm都吾夠. 我試過用14mm影,只影到半條長度多啲.  詳情 回復 發表於 2017-9-28 07:55 PM
回復 支持 1 反對 0

使用道具 舉報

johnykw 發表於 2017-9-27 13:37:11 | 顯示全部樓層
我會投16-35一票!理由好簡單,Canon鏡Canon色水
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

INDEPENDENCE 發表於 2017-9-27 21:01:17 | 顯示全部樓層
EF 16-35啦,
呢度有個師兄用佢影星空靚絕群倫,
不過我覺得你最好預多幾千蚊買filter

點評

請問一下,有這位師兄的圖片連結可以看一下嗎? 謝謝  詳情 回復 發表於 2017-10-1 01:00 PM
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

tomrit 發表於 2017-9-28 02:04:18 | 顯示全部樓層
可能既, 帶多部機拍 movie, 萬無一失
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

Tiny_Ocean 發表於 2017-9-28 10:28:18 | 顯示全部樓層
影極光wide D 好啲,光圈有大要大,一生人有幾多次機會?最多返黎覺得冇用賣鏡
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

tye 發表於 2017-9-28 19:55:03 | 顯示全部樓層
Alphonse89 發表於 2017-9-28 11:07 AM
借支14mm 比朋友去挪威影極光,

佢影完返黎既意見係14mm都唔夠wide

這亦是我的個人經驗...當極光係你正前面的時候,14mm多數都足夠. 但當極光係你頭頂過或角度好高的時候,12mm都吾夠. 我試過用14mm影,只影到半條長度多啲. 其中一個原因係我包咗少少前景係構圖中.

點評

同意師兄講法,我在加拿大影過.都認為要wide 同大光圈鏡, 夜晚全黑環境下色水不是優先考慮. Sigma 14 F1.8 一定是首選.  詳情 回復 發表於 2017-9-30 03:51 PM
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

yanluk 發表於 2017-9-30 15:51:11 | 顯示全部樓層
tye 發表於 2017-9-28 07:55 PM
這亦是我的個人經驗...當極光係你正前面的時候,14mm多數都足夠. 但當極光 ...

同意師兄講法,我在加拿大影過.都認為要wide 同大光圈鏡, 夜晚全黑環境下色水不是優先考慮.
Sigma 14 F1.8 一定是首選.
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

harima  樓主| 發表於 2017-10-1 13:00:18 | 顯示全部樓層
INDEPENDENCE 發表於 2017-9-27 09:01 PM
EF 16-35啦,
呢度有個師兄用佢影星空靚絕群倫,
不過我覺得你最好預多幾� ...

請問一下,有這位師兄的圖片連結可以看一下嗎?
謝謝
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

hotfire009 發表於 2017-10-2 20:41:48 | 顯示全部樓層
剛影完返嚟,要最WIDE,最大光圈,防震可不要,但腳架一定要,再帶另一支天涯鏡影其他風景
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

Guts 發表於 2017-10-2 23:55:10 | 顯示全部樓層
本帖最後由 Guts 於 2017-10-3 12:01 AM 編輯

Canon offer a great landscape lens.

Wider than wide: A landscape photographer's thoughts on the Canon 11-24mm

https://www.dpreview.com/article ... f-the-canon-11-24mm

點評

謝謝師兄的連結~ 但11-24超過預算,同埋好驚無保護鏡容易整花鏡頭~  詳情 回復 發表於 2017-10-3 07:00 PM
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

harima  樓主| 發表於 2017-10-3 19:00:40 | 顯示全部樓層
Guts 發表於 2017-10-2 11:55 PM
Canon offer a great landscape lens.

Wider than wide: A landscape photographer's thoughts on the C ...

謝謝師兄的連結~
但11-24超過預算,同埋好驚無保護鏡容易整花鏡頭~
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

look_yau 發表於 2017-10-12 00:38:41 | 顯示全部樓層
Fisheye Zoom ....buy la buy la
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

DENNIS547 發表於 2017-10-12 00:51:37 來自手機 | 顯示全部樓層
師兄用完 sigma 14 1.8 可放俾小弟。小弟年尾去睇極光。
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

Alien 發表於 2017-12-2 21:44:35 | 顯示全部樓層
剛往加拿大影過回來, 鏡頭Wide 啲 加大光圈有著數, 穩固的腳架重要, 加埋輕便手套禦寒更重要!!!
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

cbsphoto 發表於 2017-12-4 08:01:06 來自手機 | 顯示全部樓層
本帖最後由 cbsphoto 於 2017-12-4 08:43 PM 編輯

Sigma 20mm f1.4  This one is not very good for star photography as the video below talk about it. The astrophotography forum in dpreview also have similar opinion. My chioice, after reading dpreview astrophotography forum, is the Samyang 24mm f1.4.
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

cbsphoto 發表於 2017-12-4 20:35:33 | 顯示全部樓層
Astrophotography lens shootout: Samyang 14mm F2.4 vs Sigma 14mm F1.8
https://www.dpreview.com/videos/ ... -vs-sigma-14mm-f1-8
If you're thinking of picking up a great ultra-wide astrophotography lens, chances are good you've looked at the three 14mm primes featured in this video. The old Samyang 14mm F2.8 is a classic and affordable choice; the updated Samyang 14mm F2.4 is faster, higher quality, and not prohibitively expensive; and the Sigma 14mm F1.8 Art is a lens astrophotographers have been drooling over ever since it was announced in February.

So which do you pick, and why?

NatureTTL's Matthew Saville took all three lenses into the middle of the desert to shoot some nightscapes and compare the performance of these extremely popular choices.

You'll definitely want to check out the full video if you're deeply uncertain about which to choose—there are some great side-by-side sharpness comparisons that should satisfy the pixel peepers out there—but Saville manages to break the trio down into a very neat categories:

The Sigma 14mm F1.8 Art is your choice if you absolutely need the extra light over the F2.4 and don't mind spending a bunch more money to get it. It's extremely sharp, and will deliver exceptional results... even wide open... even in the corners.

The Samyang 14mm F2.4 is hard to beat as an overall choice when you look at performance-to-price ratio. To his eye, it's a tiny bit sharper in the corners wide open than the Sigma—even when you stop the Sigma down to F2.4—and it'll cost you half as much. You are, of course, sacrificing AutoFocus over the Sigma, but many nightscape and night sky photographers shoot in manual focus all the time anyway.

The Samyang 14mm F2.8 is by far the most affordable of the bunch. This classic lens will cost you as little as $250 on sale, making it less than half as much as the Samyang 14mm F2.4, which was already half the price of the Sigma 14mm. But that drop in price comes with a significant drop in performance. Saville labels it a great choice for those just getting into nightscape photography, as a time-lapse lens if you'll be displaying your footage in 1080p, or as a solid backup that is so cheap it would be silly not to own one.

Check out the full video up top to hear all of Saville's thoughts on these three popular 14mm primes. And if you want to find out more about why the Sigma 14mm F1.8 Art lens just might be worth spending that bundle of money on, click on the big blue button below to read about why DPReview's Dale Baskin named it his Gear of the Year 2017.


The Best Lens for Star Photos | Sigma 14mm f/1.8 Art vs. Samyang 14mm f/2.4 & f/2.8 (aka Rokinon), Rokinson=Samyang
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JpnZ4pU763s
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 註冊

本版積分規則

登錄 發佈 快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表